Overall I think I nailed my first draft of the first paper. My biggest concern with the project was that my ideas were unorganized. I feel I am a really good writer, my problem is organization, and eventually wrapping my ideas together to make sense to my claim. My peers liked my claim and my defending of my claims through out the paper. They liked how I defended my quotes and related to the articles. I am working best with Dweck when I talk about Dweck’s growth mindset experiment with the class of 10 year olds. They think I can talk about the fixed mindset better and more. I work with Lukianoff and Haidt the best when I talk about the micro aggressions. The micro aggressions and the too sensitive PC culture is something that affects us today In college, and I can relate to it very well. Thats when my best work comes out when I genuinely relate to the subject material. My peers said they could feel what I am saying and that I truly believed in what I was defending in my claim. According to my peers the two biggest challenges in this paper are providing more examples in my paper of claims I am making. There are points in the essay where both of my peers comment on how I could insert a quote to defend my point. The other challenge I have is I could go into more detail on some of my claims. At certain points my peers commented on how I could expand on my thoughts. I will help my reader get my perspective by providing more quotes and expanding on my thoughts to make more sense to my claim.